C D E
F G H
I J K
L M N O
P Q R S
T U V W
X Y Z
SUBMIT YOUR OWN REVIEW
RETURN TO MOVIE
Am Sam (PG-13, 2001)...
(Sean Penn, Michelle Pfeiffer, Dianne Wiest, Dakota
Fanning, Laura Dern)
I had heard so much ballyhoo about Sean Penn's portrayal of a mentally
challenged father that I was chomping at the bit for this movie to be
released on video. It was worth the wait.
Penn plays Sam Dawson, a man who has the mental capacity of a
seven-year-old. He works as a clean-up person at Starbucks and has a
small circle of other mentally challenged friends who like to eat at IHOP,
have "video nights" and each other's houses, and are an amazing
support group for each other.
Sam lets a homeless woman spend the night in his apartment to get out of
the cold, and she thanks him by seducing him. Viola! She gets
pregnant, gives birth, and promptly ditches Sam and their baby, Lucy
Diamond Dawson. And so the story begins.
Sam and Lucy are a team -- they help each other, teach each other and love
each other unconditionally. But, as Lucy grows and starts to learn
more and more, it's evident that she is going to surpass Sam's mental
capacity in no time. It's not a problem for them, but it's a huge
problem for the Child Welfare folks that are hell-bent on finding Lucy
Michelle Pfeiffer plays Rita Harrison, a high powered, high strung
attorney who only deals with "A list" clients. Sam tries
to retain her as his lawyer, only to be rebuffed. Through a series
of events and Sam's innocent persistence, she agrees to take his case pro
The story isn't plausible, but the acting more than makes up for it.
The movie is both heart wrenching and heartwarming, and Penn, Pfeiffer and
Fanning are remarkable. Dakota Fanning's eyes tell the entire story
without ever opening her mouth, and Penn and Pfeiffer are so convincing in
their roles and their character's struggles that I was totally, thoroughly
You will laugh. You will cry. You will shake your head and
rethink your own views on parenting. And you will know pure and
the Bedroom (R, 2001)...
(Sissy Spacek, Tom Wilkinson, Nick Stahl, Marisa Tomei,
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrghhhh, this was so brutal. Yes, I know, I
know, it got nominated for a gazillion Academy Awards. Fine,
theatrically this movie was a masterpiece. The acting was
phenomenal. So what. Watching this film was at times like
watching grass grow, and at other times like having someone pull every one
of the hairs off of your body one by one with tweezers. This was the
most god-awful depressing relentlessly bleak movie driven by misery known
As "Leaving Las Vegas" was 2 hours of watching Nicolas Cage act
drunk to the point of destroying himself, this was 2 hours of watching
people go through the grieving process. Do I need to watch
that? If I wanted to see people grieving for two hours I could just
watch the news every night. And that wouldn't even cost me a rental
For those of you who still want to see this movie, stop reading, I'm about
to give away the whole story. Spacek and Wilkinson play a happily
married couple whose charming graduate student son played by Nick Stahl
has fallen in love with an older sensitive woman played by Marisa
Tomei. Tomei's character is at the end of finalizing a messy
divorce. The son and Tomei's character sincerely love each other,
but his mother is concerned that he is in over his head. Speaking of
heads, Tomei's low-life trailer trash dirtbag soon to be X-husband shows
up early in the movie and shoot's Stahl right in the freaking head.
The joy and happiness ensues AND NEVER STOPS!
The rest of the movie is one slow-paced scene after another of mom and dad
staring into space, their marriage and lives slowly falling apart as a
result of their tragic loss. Towards the very end it finally gets
interesting when the father decides to get revenge, but ultimately you
don't know what actually happens ... and the credits role.
I'll give it 2.5 stars based solely on the acting, but other than that, to
enjoy this movie you REALLY have to be into films that methodically plod
along morbidly oozing dread which saturates every frame of the film.
Pacino, Russell Crowe)
This is a "must-see" movie. The basic premise of the
movie - "guy has inside information on the tobacco industry and is
torn as to whether he should do what is right risking his family and his
life" - seems somewhat bland, but believe me, this movie is anything
Al Pacino plays the producer of 60-minutes, and is
The film is based on a true story and is VERY
dramatic. Also making it enjoyable is the voyeuristic aspect, the
feeling that you're getting a glimpse at the unsavory happenings behind
the scenes at 60 Minutes. GO
SEE THIS MOVIE!
This movie is based (very loosely, one suspects) on the true story
of Jeff Wigand (Russell Crowe), a scientist at a tobacco company who
became a leading whistleblower in the industry lawsuits of the mid-1990's,
and Lowell Bergman (Al Pacino), the ex-radical-turned-60-Minutes-journalist
who coaxed him into talking, having no idea what a battle he was getting
them into. This is tried-and-true territory for Pacino; he has been the
idealistic crusader many times before (And Justice for All and
Dog Day Afternoon come to mind), but he still holds the power behind
his ever-more-deeply-etched face, and we still cheer for him. Crowe has a
more subtle role--a (seemingly) ordinary family man, put under
unimaginable stress--and his acting is a masterpiece of careful control
and release. Of course, it was the Mississippi Attorney General's office
that set the lawsuits in motion, and one clever surprise is AG Michael
Moore playing himself--and it really is a pleasure to see a movie in which
white Southern politicians are among the good guys! In addition to the
tobacco country ambiance, the atmosphere of a big TV news show is conjured
effortlessly. An important part of this atmosphere is Christopher Plummer,
playing Mike Wallace as a tough journalist who refuses to take guff, even
from tobacco companies or (I am not making this up) Hezbollah terrorists.
If there isn't a Best Supporting Actor nomination waiting in the wings,
there should be. The movie's largest drawback is that it is almost too
suspenseful, especially in the first 40 or so minutes; endless soundtrack
noodling exacerbates this, but the plot alleviates the problem as it picks
up. What makes this film great is that it offers more than suspense for
its own sake--it dares to make us think.
(Al Pacino, Hilary Swank, Robin Williams, Martin Donovan,
Insomnia stars Robin Williams, although you wouldn’t know it about 45
minutes into the movie. It was about then that we grabbed the Blockbuster
box to see if Williams was really in the film as he had yet to make his
The movie is 90% an Al Pacino movie, and he does his usual job, this time
playing a tough (but sensitive underneath) detective from L.A. whose efforts
to stop the low-lifes has led him to cross some lines that he later
regrets. In an effort to get him out of the immediate pressure mounting on
he and his partner back in L.A. the department has loaned him temporarily to
help with a small-town Alaskan murder of a teen-aged girl. It is there that
he accidentally kills his partner while chasing the killer through the fog …
or was it an accident. His partner admitted the pressure was getting to
him, that he was going succumb to Internal Affairs and confess to some
fudging of evidence in a high-profile murder back in L.A. Knowing that it
would appear highly suspicious, Pacino tells everyone that the man they were
chasing was the one who fired the shot.
after, Pacino begins getting creepy calls from the main suspect, an Alaskan
writer, who seems to know that Pacino shot his partner. A string of
cat-and-mouse mind games ensues. The race to capture the killer, save his
reputation, and fight his own conscience follows.
Insomnia has a clever plot, some interesting characters, and beautiful
Alaskan scenery. I thought the initial build up to what was happening and
why it was happening was a tad confusing which was a bit of detractor. In
fact, when Pacino shoots he partner, it is not entirely clear exactly what
transpired. We actually went back to that scene on the DVD to see if we
could follow it a second time around.
Although I can’t pin-point exactly why I am not raving about it, Insomnia
is, indeed, a good, smart thriller. Solid. Not great, but solid. A more
than worthy rental, particularly if you like Pacino or Robin Williams.
"Insomnia" ends up being the classic struggle between good
and evil and right and wrong. It just takes a while to get there.
Al Pacino plays a California detective who is dispatched -- along with his
partner -- to some God-forsaken area in Alaska to help solve a murder.
Upon their arrival, they are greeted by an over-zealous local detective
(Swank) who has kept tabs on Pacino since she wrote her thesis on his
work. Pacino finds her adoration amusing; she finds him better than
Without giving away too much of the plot, Pacino and his partner are the
targets of an internal investigation into a situation that may possibly
end their long and illustrious careers. Unfortunately, they don't
see eye-to-eye on how they are going to approach an upcoming inquiry, and
Pacino's partner ends up dead. Just one catch -- the murderer they
are tracking is the witness to the death.
Al Pacino plays his part relatively quietly (for Pacino) -- no veins in
his neck bulging, no screaming fits -- just a solid performance.
Swank is great as a detective coming to grips with her fantasy becoming
reality, and Robin Williams is creepy. As a rule, Williams annoys
me. He's too over-the-top -- too much to relax and enjoy. No
doubt the man is a genius...he just needs a LOT of Thorazine.
However, he is very reserved in this part -- a calculating, sad, lonely
man who vacillates between contempt and pride for what he has done.
I gave "Insomnia" 3.5 stars because the scenery is amazing, the
acting is solid and there are some truly tense moments in the film.
It was a bit long and some of the scenes were a little too labored, but
it's a good, old-fashioned suspense flick.
(R, 1999)... Average: 3.0
(Cuba Gooding Jr, Anthony Hopkins, Donald Sutherland)
This is a movie about a scientist (Anthony Hopkins) who, prior
to the start of the movie, studied gorillas in Africa and for two years
lived among them. His two years in Africa ended with him killing two
Hopkins has been a favorite since my all-time favorite movie
"Silence of the Lambs". He plays psychos better than
anyone. The movie picks up with Hopkins being brought back to prison
in the U.S. and analyzed by a psychiatrist (Cuba Gooding) who attempts to
learn his story and why it ended in murder, and at the same time learns a
little about life.
This was an above average movie. The
scriptwriter should have consulted me first, however, as they could have
turned this into a much better film by doing a few simple but major
things: Cut out the overly dramatic. (1) The whole "evil
and mean spirited prison guard" thing was cheesy and totally
unnecessary. The movie would have gone along just fine and made its
point without the prison being an unrealistic hell-hole. (2) Clean
up the dialog of Cuba Gooding. He's a fine actor, but for a supposed
top-notch psychiatrist I found myself too often thinking "Hey, that
was a stupid thing to say to a psychotic patient." Overall, not
a bad movie, but it could have been much better had they discussed it with
me first before filming.
This movie is now in video and it is worth the $3.99 to rent. It held my interest, but I was very sad when
the poachers killed the gorillas. Enjoy.